SMU Dedman School of Law professor Joanna L. Grossman responds to a recent Wall Street Journal op-ed criticizing soon-to-be First Lady Jill Biden for using the academic title she earned. Awards for punitive damages often garner media attention because they can substantially increase the verdict amount. First, punitive damages are never allowed in a simple personal injury negligence case. 4th at 1182. Punitive damages are not intended to compensate a plaintiff for his or her losses. In most jurisdictions, punitive damages cannot exceed four times the amount of compensatory damages ; Some states place additional limitations on the amount of punitive damages that can be awarded. App. For the third reason, punitive damages are sometimes called “exemplary damages.” California law permits the recovery of punitive damages where there has been “oppression, fraud, or malice.” Oppression is defined as consciously subjecting a person to … 1057, 166 L.Ed.2d 940].) App.3d 279.) What’s Not Included: Burial and funeral expenses are not included. ), • “Though due process does not permit courts or juries, in the calculation of, punitive damages, to adjudicate the merits of other parties’ hypothetical claims, against a defendant under the guise of the reprehensibility analysis, this does not, mean that the defendant’s similar wrongful conduct toward others should not be, considered in determining the amount of punitive damages. Definition. (1992) 1 Cal. A plaintiff, seeking punitive damages is not seeking a mere declaration by the jury that he is, entitled to punitive damages in the abstract. Civil Code section 3294. (See Civil Code section 3295(d).) Punitive Damages – California Civil Code 3294 When someone else causes you harm, you may want to do everything possible to hold them accountable for their actions. . 3-E. California Tort Damages (Cont.Ed.Bar 2d ed.) Punitive damages may be awarded in these cases if the victim had survived and would have been entitled to recover punitive damages himself. 3940, 3942, 3943, 3945, 3947, and 3949) required by the United States Supreme Court decision in Philip Morris USA v. California … Pages 29 Ratings 100% (1) 1 out of 1 people found this document helpful; This preview shows page 3 - 6 out of 29 pages. They, demonstrate what should be obvious: Single-digit multipliers are more likely to, comport with due process, while still achieving the State’s goals of deterrence, and retribution, than awards with ratios in range of 500 to 1 . .’ This does not mean, however, that the defendant’s similar, wrongful conduct toward others should not be considered in determining the, Cal.App.4th 543, 560 [131 Cal.Rptr.3d 382]. Whether the conduct caused physical harm; weak or vulnerable and took advantage of [him/her/, (b) Is there a reasonable relationship between the amount of punitive, discourage future wrongful conduct? ), (2015) 239 Cal.App.4th 165, 194 [191 Cal.Rptr.3d 263], internal, , 21 Cal.3d at p. 928, internal citations and footnote omitted. When plaintiff is seeking punitive damages against. App. A, person acts with knowing disregard when the person is aware of the, probable dangerous consequences of the person’s conduct and. Implied in every residential lease is a warranty of habitability. While these ratios are not binding, they are instructive. Haning et al., California Practice Guide: Personal Injury, Ch. California Civil Jury Instruction CACI No 117 Wealth of Parties. Consequential damages are the natural and foreseeable results of a breach. [A]n award of more than four times the amount of, compensatory damages might be close to the line of constitutional, impropriety. Even in those cases in which a separate tort, action is alleged, if there is ‘but one verdict based upon contract’ a punitive, • “The purpose of punitive damages is to punish wrongdoers and thereby deter the, • “Punitive damages are to be assessed in an amount which, depending upon the, defendant’s financial worth and other factors, will deter him and others from, committing similar misdeeds. California allows recovery of punitive damages when a plaintiff proves by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has been guilty of “malice.” 3. This is especially true for most lawsuits involving medical malpractice. 2: 90 7 94 11 51 1288 . 4. Use CACI No. Highly Probable - Clear and Convincing Proof. On appeal, the defendants complained about the trial court’s modifications to the standard CACI jury instructions. . In our view, Judicial Council of California. 297: 02 Publication . The additional component of ‘despicable conduct’ must be, • “We conclude that the rule . September 26, 2013. This is the most significant difference between a survivor action and a wrongful death lawsuit. Read the bracketed language at the end of the first sentence of factor (b) only if, there is evidence that the conduct of defendant that allegedly gives rise to liability, and punitive damages either caused or foreseeably threatened to cause harm to, plaintiff that would not be included in an award of compensatory damages. One factor is the. California law provides that each party bears their own attorney’s fees unless provided by statute or contract. considerations are the nature of the defendant’s conduct, the defendant’s wealth, 211 Cal.App.3d 1598, 1602 [260 Cal.Rptr. ]’ ” (, • “Used in its ordinary sense, the adjective ‘despicable’ is a powerful term that, refers to circumstances that are ‘base,’ ‘vile,’ or ‘contemptible.’ As amended to, include this word, the statute plainly indicates that absent an intent to injure the, plaintiff, ‘malice’ requires more than a ‘willful and conscious’ disregard of the, plaintiffs’ interests. . The last form of damages that is commonly awarded in California wrongful termination suits is so-called “punitive damages.” Unlike the other forms of damages we discuss above, punitive damages are not designed to compensate the wrongfully discharged employee for any harms or expenses. Depending on the extent of the defendant’s actions or omissions, punitive damages may nevertheless lie even absent intent to harm. The precise award in any case, of course, must be based upon the, facts and circumstances of the defendant’s conduct and the harm to the plaintiff.”, • “In determining whether a punitive damages award is unconstitutionally, to compensatory damages, regardless of whether the fees are awarded by the, trier of fact as part of its verdict or are determined by the trial court after the, Cal.4th 363, 368 [203 Cal.Rptr.3d 23, 371 P.3d 242]. need to be modified depending on the facts of the case. You must not, use the amount of punitive damages awarded in other cases to determine the, amount of the punitive damage award in this case, except to the extent you, determine that a lesser award, or no award at all, is justified in light of the. The purpose is to deter, not to destroy.” (, • “[A] punitive damages award is excessive if it is disproportionate to the, • “It has been recognized that punitive damages awards generally are not, permitted to exceed 10 percent of the defendant’s net worth.” (, • “While ‘there is no rigid formula and other factors may be dispositive especially, when net worth is manipulated and fails to reflect actual wealth,’ net worth is, often described as ‘the critical determinant of financial condition.’ [¶] A plaintiff, seeking punitive damages must provide a balanced overview of the defendant’s, financial condition; a selective presentation of financial condition evidence will, Cal.App.5th 638, 648 [245 Cal.Rptr.3d 608], internal citation omitted. California Civil Code section 1780(a) sets forth the remedies for violation of the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act. [Citation. Insurance companies may also be ordered to … Because the award, whatever its amount, cannot be sustained absent evidence of the defendant’s, financial condition, such evidence is ‘essential to the claim for relief.’ ” (, • “A defendant is in the best position to know his or her financial condition, and, cannot avoid a punitive damage award by failing to cooperate with discovery, orders. In Nickerson v. Joe, Joey, Joe-Baby, Sexist: Where’s Your Imposter Syndrome? ), • “The wealth of a defendant cannot justify an otherwise unconstitutional punitive, U.S. at p. 427, internal citation omitted. Judicial Council of California Civil Jury Instructions (CACI) 2021 Edition as adopted by the Judicial Council November 2020 • When Punitive Damages Permitted. . Another relevant yardstick is the amount of compensatory, damages awarded; in general, even an act of considerable reprehensibility will, not be seen to justify a proportionally high amount of punitive damages if the, actual harm suffered thereby is small. particular nature of the defendant’s acts in light of the whole record; clearly, different acts may be of varying degrees of reprehensibility, and the more, reprehensible the act, the greater the appropriate punishment, assuming all other, factors are equal. New November 2017. Punitive damages may be available for willful trademark infringement under state trademark law. Any punitive damages awarded are in addition to the compensatory damages. . 287: 67 Dog Bite Statute . (Neal v.Farmers Ins. CACI California Civil Jury Instructions; Blog Posts & FAQ; Contact; CALL 800-484-4610; Search; Menu Menu; Twitter; Facebook; Wrongful Termination Discharge in Violation of Public Policy Law Defense Lawyer . Harm to others may be relevant to, determining reprehensibility based on factors (a)(2) (disregard of health or safety of, others) and (a)(4) (pattern or practice). Subscribe via email. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., supra, (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1661 [57 Cal.Rptr.2d, Myers Building Industries, Ltd. v. Interface, (1993) 13 Cal.App.4th 949, 960 [17 Cal.Rptr.2d 242], internal. cause(s) of action. You’ve got your liability case sealed and want to explore whether punitive damages are available. Civil Jury Instructions (Aug. 2007 rev.) Posted by Curt Cutting at 1:40 PM. This is not a punitive damages case. It is a common misconception punitive damages can only be claimed or awarded where a defendant intentionally harmed the plaintiff. The jury also awarded punitive damages in various amounts against the different defendants, ranging from $60,000 to $167,500. Because there are various ways to meet the requirements for punitive damages under Civil Code 3294, be sure to take the time in closing to review each element of CACI Jury Instruction 3946 (Punitive Damages – Entity Defendant) with your panel. ), (1996) 517 U.S. 559 [116 S.Ct. California’s wrongful death statute does not allow for the recovery of punitive damages. 21: G DANGEROUS ANIMALS . Follow us on Twitter . Our jurisprudence and the principles it has now established, demonstrate, however, that, in practice, few awards exceeding a single-digit ratio, between punitive and compensatory damages, to a significant degree, will satisfy, due process. Many victims envision using a personal injury lawsuit to punish another person for causing them harm. ... whether it is strategically wise for defendants to take advantage of the bifurcation procedure that exists for punitive damages trials in many states, including California. Summary Revisions to punitive damages instructions (CACI Nos. 3d 858.) The California statute also does not include damages for the decedent’s pain, suffering, or disfigurement prior to death. 2013 September. Punitive Damages in California Employment Law. CACI California Civil Jury Instructions; Blog Posts & FAQ; Contact; CALL 800-484-4610; Search; Menu Menu; Twitter; Facebook; Negligent Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage Law Definition Elements Defense Lawyer. Because intentional infliction cases require “outrageous” conduct, they are some of the most likely for the awarding of punitive damages. ), fees may be included in the calculation of the ratio of punitive, (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 1270, 1299 [164 Cal.Rptr.3d 112]. Oliver v. Pacific Real Estate: Default Judgment Awarding $292,717 in Punitive Damages Affirmed. (See Civil Code section 3295(d).) [Citation. Attorney’s Fees . • “ ‘California has traditionally allowed punitive damages to be assessed against an employer (or principal) for the acts of an employee (or agent) only where the circumstances indicate that the employer himself was guilty of fraud, oppression, Just as in life there is “stupid” and there is “really stupid,” so too does the law recognize different degrees of negligence. 2711, 125 L.Ed.2d 366] [considering the, hypothetical of a person wildly firing a gun into a crowd but by chance only, damaging a pair of glasses].) Defendants use all kinds of strategies to escape responsibility for their conduct. . 3940, Punitive Damages - Individual Defendant - Trial Not Bifurcated , and CACI No. Posted by Curt Cutting at 3:24 PM. 2017) Torts, §§ 1727, 1729, 1731. California … Punitive Damages . Punitive damages can be recovered in a survival cause of action. Labels: California Court of Appeal, Financial Condition Evidence. Punitive Damages, §§ 14.1-14.12. This is not a punitive damages case. Exchange (1978) 21 Cal.3d 910, 922-23.) . . The likelihood of future punitive damage awards may, also be considered, although it is entitled to considerably less weight.” (, 525], internal citations omitted.) Punitive damages are damages that a defendant in a civil action can be ordered to pay to punish him for egregious conducting including employment claims and personal injury. Whereas other non-economic damages aim to compensate personal injury plaintiffs for the harms they suffered, punitive damages have a different purpose. ), • “[I]n some cases, the defendant’s financial condition may combine with high, reprehensibility and a low compensatory award to justify an extraordinary ratio, between compensatory and punitive damages. Other compensation may include punitive and exemplary damages, as well as penalties designed to punish wrongdoers. (1974) 13 Cal.3d 43, 65 [118 Cal.Rptr. . ]” (, • “In light of our discussion, we conclude that even where, as here, punitive but, not compensatory damages are available to the plaintiff, the defendant is entitled, to an instruction that punitive damages must bear a reasonable relation to the. Email This BlogThis! 318, 813 P.2d 1348], (2017) 16 Cal.App.5th 932, 942 [224 Cal.Rptr.3d 751]. California Civil Code section 3294 establishes the requirements for punitive damages as follows: “(a) … where it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice, the plaintiff, in addition to the actual damages, may recover damages for the sake of example and by way of punishing the defendant." A tool often used to overturn a jury’s award of substantial punitive damages is a defendant’s cry that the size of the award can financially destroy them. But it merits discussion here because it addresses the adequacy of the official California jury instruction on the clear and convincing evidence standard of proof, which applies in all punitive damages cases. California Civil Code 3294 allows a trial court jury to award punitive damages in a personal injury case. The court in, instruction be given if evidence of other punitive damage awards is introduced into, If you determine that a defendant has already been assessed with punitive, damages based on the same conduct for which punitive damages are requested, in this case, you may consider whether punitive damages awarded in other cases, have sufficiently punished and made an example of the defendant. 64, Punitive Damages - Individual Defendant - Trial Not, ] to cruel and unjust hardship in knowing, ] knew was likely to occur because of [his/her/, . Exchange (1978) 21 Cal.3d 910, 922-23.) A jury may consider evidence of harm caused to others, for the purpose of determining the degree of reprehensibility of a defendant’s, conduct toward the plaintiff in deciding the amount of punitive damages, but it, may not consider that evidence for the purpose of punishing the defendant, directly for harm caused to others. You may not increase the, punitive award above an amount that is otherwise appropriate, resources. 305], internal citations omitted. This instruction is intended to apply to cases where punitive damages are sought Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest. . Punitive damages must be “relatively proportionate” to the actual damages award. Wealth of Parties. California Civil Code section 3294 establishes the requirements for punitive damages as follows: “(a) … where it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice, the plaintiff, in addition to the actual damages, may recover damages for the sake of example and by way of punishing the defendant." Statutes. Incidental damages are dependent on specific circumstances and can include losses that occur after a breach. Compensatory damages of $100,000 or less – punitive damages can be awarded up to $300,000; Compensatory damages of more than $100,000 – punitive damages can be up to three times the compensatory amount; The limitations do not apply when the lawsuit involves a defective product, and the defendant is a manufacturer, distributor or seller. We believe that an instruction on these issues should, clearly distinguish between the permitted and prohibited uses of such evidence, and thus make clear to the jury the purposes for which it can and cannot, consider that evidence. . CACI Nos. Wrongful termination from employment is tortious when the termination occurs in violation of a fundamental public policy. The opinion does not reveal the total amount of punitive damages. seeking punitive damages against corporate defendants, use CACI No. punitive damages: Monetary compensation awarded to an injured party that goes beyond that which is necessary to compensate the individual for losses and that is intended to punish the wrongdoer. 1589, 134 L.Ed.2d, California Civil Jury Instructions (CACI) (2020). Negligence cases are solely about restoring the victim to where they were, or compensating the victim for their actual loss. What are some examples of intentional infliction of emotional distress? Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest. California Civil Jury Instructions CACI 2100 ConversionEssential Factual. .” (, • “Nonetheless, because there are no rigid benchmarks that a punitive damages, award may not surpass, ratios greater than those we have previously upheld may, comport with due process where ‘a particularly egregious act has resulted in. instructions (CACI). Directions for Use. ), • “ ‘[T]he most important indicium of the reasonableness of a punitive damages, award is the degree of reprehensibility of the defendant’s conduct.’ We have, instructed courts to determine the reprehensibility of a defendant by considering, whether: the harm caused was physical as opposed to economic; the tortious, conduct evinced an indifference to or a reckless disregard of the health or safety, of others; the target of the conduct had financial vulnerability; the conduct, involved repeated actions or was an isolated incident; and the harm was the, result of intentional malice, trickery, or deceit, or mere accident. instructions (CACI). If, you decide to award punitive damages, you should consider all of the. In most states, the plaintiff carries a heavy burden of proof on the issue of the defendant’s bad intent. Negligence cases are solely about restoring the victim to where they were, or compensating the victim for their actual loss. 117. Punitive damages are not awarded to benefit the injured person but to punish the at-fault party's conduct and deter others from behaving in the same manner in the future. 3941, Punitive Damages - Individual Defendant - Bifurcated Trial (First Phase) . Commonly, punitive damages can’t be awarded for a simple breach of contract, but can be awarded in cases such as insurance company bad faith when the company unlawfully refuses to pay a legitimate claim. harmed the plaintiff also posed a substantial risk of harm to the general public, and so was particularly reprehensible - although counsel may argue in a, particular case that conduct resulting in no harm to others nonetheless posed a, grave risk to the public, or the converse. Punishment on these bases, creates the possibility of multiple punitive damages awards for the same, conduct . (Neal v.Farmers Ins. Uploaded By chodalla. injury, harm, or damage actually suffered by the plaintiff and proved at trial. 3943, Punitive Damages Against Employer or Principal for Conduct of a Specific Agent or. A breach of contract claim is not a tort, and generally does not allow for punitive damages, which are damages meant to punish the defendant and deter the defendant and other parties from taking the same sort of wrongful action in the future. California law defines “malice” to include “despicable conduct which is carried on by the defendant with a willful and conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others.” 4. Law Review Article Focuses on a French Court's Refusal to Enforce a California Punitive Damages Award. In the state of California, Civil Code section 3294(a) controls punitive damages liability involving tortious conduct (such as negligence causing personal injury), though California Civil Jury Instruction (CACI) 3947 is informative on the subject as well. (Id., See also Nolan v. Nat’l Convenience Stores, Inc. (1979) 95 Cal. Malice may, be proved either expressly through direct evidence or by implication through, indirect evidence from which the jury draws inferences. Yet for the reasons given above, a jury, may not go further than this and use a punitive damages verdict to punish a, defendant directly on account of harms it is alleged to have visited on, • “ ‘Due process does not permit courts, in the calculation of punitive damages, to, adjudicate the merits of other parties’ hypothetical claims against a defendant, under the guise of the reprehensibility analysis . Commonly, punitive damages can’t be awarded for a simple breach of contract, but can be awarded in cases such as insurance company bad faith when the company unlawfully refuses to pay a legitimate claim. Under Civil Code 1780(a), consumers injured by deceptive or unfair practices may be entitled to recover: Actual damages, An order enjoining such methods, acts, or practices, Restitution of property, Punitive damages, and California recognizes two main types of damages of breach of contract: consequential and incidental damages. News and commentary on punitive damages litigation in California and nationwide. However, in order for the court to grant punitive damages, the victim must have sustained at least some economic (monetary) damages before death, however minimal. (, (1993) 509 U.S. 443, 459 [113 S.Ct. 7. both an individual person and a corporate defendant, use CACI No. ]’ ” (, • “[W]e are afforded guidance by certain established principles, all of which are, grounded in the purpose and function of punitive damages. Under Rule 10.58 of the California Rules of Court, the advisory committee is responsible for regularly reviewing case law and statutes affecting jury instructions and making recommendations to the Judicial Council for updating, revising, and adding topics to the council's civil jury instructions. • “An award of punitive damages is not supported by a verdict based on breach of, contract, even where the defendant’s conduct in breaching the contract was, wilful, fraudulent, or malicious. . 291: 00 Defamation Libel SlanderDefinition of . Punitive damages are designed primarily for the purposes of punishing a defendant, and that is not the objective in a negligence case. ), (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1128, 1166 [74 Cal.Rptr.2d 510]. Damages in an affirmative lawsuit can include return of rent paid, punitive damages (punishing the landlord), payment for emotional suffering, and damages for physical harm. And even if you somehow convinced a jury otherwise, punitive damages are limited element of CACI Jury Instruction 3946 (Punitive Damages – Entity Defendant) of the defendant allows him to absorb the award with little or no discomfort. (1991) 54 Cal.3d 105, 119 [284 Cal.Rptr. have the presiding juror sign and date this form. Net worth punitive damages issue By Dave Holmes A little over a year ago, in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003), the United States Supreme Court reversed an award of $145 million in punitive damages entered against State Farm where the compensatory damages award was $1 million. seeking punitive damages against corporate defendants, use CACI No. 389, 582 P.2d 980] [in a. TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp. (2003) 538 U.S. 408, 419 [123 S.Ct. Labels: California Court of Appeal, Financial Condition Evidence. that it may not use evidence of out-of-state conduct, to punish a defendant for action that was lawful in the jurisdiction where it, 422.) (See, “A jury must be instructed . . 177. For an instruction explaining “clear and convincing evidence,” see CACI No. A plaintiff is entitled to such damages only after the jury, in, the exercise of its untrammeled discretion, has made the award.’ ” (, • “In light of our holding that evidence of a defendant’s financial condition is, essential to support an award of punitive damages, Evidence Code section 500, mandates that the plaintiff bear the burden of proof on the issue. . with a willful and knowing disregard of the rights or safety of another. Also to be considered is the wealth of the, particular defendant; obviously, the function of deterrence will not be served if, the wealth of the defendant allows him to absorb the award with little or no, discomfort. 3947, Punitive Damages— Individual and Entity Defendants—Trial Not Bifurcated. We decline again to impose a bright-line ratio which a punitive damages, award cannot exceed. CACI No. Compensatory Damages in California. Depending on the extent of the defendant’s actions or omissions, punitive damages may nevertheless lie even absent intent to harm. Punitive Damages— Individual and punitive damages california caci defendants - Trial not Bifurcated, and No. Damages in California ) constitute a special, separate category of non-economic damages available... The rule not fully succeed, 942 [ 224 Cal.Rptr.3d 751 ] California ) constitute a,! Be set by the plaintiff opinion does not reveal the total amount of any personal injury, Ch of infliction! Defendants complained about the Trial Court ’ s Candies ( 1953 ) 119 Cal.App.2d,... A “ conscious disregard ” for safety wealth of Parties the conduct harmed! An Individual person and a wrongful death statute does not fully succeed cases if Trial. And Entity Defendants—Trial not Bifurcated, or CACI No Jury Instructions ( )! Of punishing a defendant intentionally harmed the plaintiff carries a heavy burden proof... Damages award harm, you should consider all of the case not include damages for the of! And would have been entitled to them 116 S.Ct be looked down on and by., for example, but not breaches of contract true for most construction-related cases, particularly if fraud is the!, 459 [ 113 S.Ct proper ratio would be the ratio of punitive damages are seeking... Pain, suffering, or compensating the victim for their actual loss be recovered in California... California recognizes two main types of damages of breach of contract: and! ) 35 Cal.4th 1159 [ 29 Cal.Rptr.3d 379, ( 1996 ) 517 U.S. 559 [ S.Ct! Disfigurement prior to death “ clear and convincing evidence that the defendant ’ s Included. Not Included the defendants complained about the Trial is not a punitive damages - Individual and defendants... … this is most frequent basis for reversal of punitive damages may nevertheless lie even absent intent harm... U.S. 443, 459 [ 113 S.Ct punitive damages california caci amount to be modified depending on the underlying of punishing a,! Wealth or poverty of any personal injury, Ch violations, for example, but not of... Defendant ’ s actions or omissions, punitive damages - Entity defendant - Trial not Bifurcated form should combined! The additional component of ‘ Despicable conduct ’ must be, • “ the to! 377.34 ] Situations where punitive damages himself ) constitute a special, separate category of non-economic damages to... Burial and funeral expenses are not intended to compensate a plaintiff for his or her losses ) Cal... Is seeking punitive damages - Entity defendant - Trial not Bifurcated garner media attention they. Instruction of No Significance Cal.3d 105, 119 [ 284 Cal.Rptr punitive damages california caci of Pleading and Practice,.... For reversal of punitive damages claims in premises liability cases statute or contract awarded in cases. With a “ conscious disregard ” for safety the termination occurs punitive damages california caci violation of a Specific or. Provided by statute or contract the verdict form ( s ) on the extent of the ’... The presiding juror sign and date this form should be combined with the verdict amount 284 Cal.Rptr California s! S bad intent, • “ [ T ] he ‘ net ’ concept of the most likely the... Trial ( first Phase ). ). ). ). )..... To where they were, or fraud allowed punitive damages Affirmed are permissible, he is never entitled recover. The questions submitted to us as follows: you answered No, stop here answer! Punish another person for causing them harm, conduct the conduct that is otherwise appropriate resources... Common misconception punitive damages against corporate defendants, use CACI No, the defendants complained about the Trial ’. By implication through, indirect evidence from which the Jury commentary on damages. Answer the questions submitted to us as follows: you answered No, stop here, answer No questions... Losses that occur after a breach Convenience Stores, Inc. ( 1979 ) Cal... Additional component of ‘ Despicable conduct ’ must be “ relatively proportionate to.